Everyone knows that in the inner city, in order to have an outstanding school, one needs a bunch of outstanding teachers. Fill a school with ordinary teachers and you'll never sing to Ofsted's tune. Neither will you get excellent results, because only the extraordinary teacher can get inner city kids to dance to something other than Hip Hop and R&B.And there we have the problem. Extraordinary teachers are rare, by definition. Most of them are satisfactory and a handful are good. Most teachers want to finish work by 5 or 6pm. After all, they began their days at 7:30 or 8 am. Most teachers don't want to work more than 4 or 5 hours at the weekend. Even by these standards, we're looking at 50 or 55 hours a week. And that isn't 50 hours of sitting at a computer. For some, that's about 30 hours of battling it out in Vietnam and another 20 or so doing something less stressful like planning or marking.
So what do the extraordinary teachers do? Well, for one, they tend to think the ones who work 50 or 55 hours per week are lazy. They of course are somewhere nearer the 60 or 70 hour mark. And then, in spite of the exhaustion that can be induced in Vietnam, they dance about their classrooms, jumping on every child's wandering eye, seizing every opportunity for inspiration and dazzling children by making their subject 'fun'.
Those of us who wish our schools to be outstanding watch these gems at work and wish longingly that all of our teachers could be like this. If only we could make them all extraordinary. If only we could shoot the rest of them. But that's just the problem. Extraordinary, by definition, means exceptional.
But we're all so brainwashed into believing that if children are more interested in Hip Hop than they are in history, then it must be the fault of the teacher. His lessons aren't sparkly enough. His planning isn't thorough enough. His whole being is simply satisfactory and he should never have become a teacher. What those of us in the state sector never seem to grasp is that no other country in the world is so 'advanced' when it comes to top teaching. Nor do we realise that in the private sector ordinary teaching is not only the norm but extraordinary teachers are very rare indeed.
What makes the schools in Nigeria successful is not their teachers, but their children. What makes the schools in the private sector successful is not their teachers, but their children. And what makes China arguably the most powerful nation in the world and certainly set to be so in the future, is not their teachers, but their children.
China doesn't make demands of her teachers as Britain does. China respects her teachers. Whether extraordinary or ordinary, they are all treated with respect. China requires obedience from her children and never apologises for her teachers. Compete with Hip Hop and R&B and make one's subject fun? The Chinese would laugh at such an idea. Blame the teacher for the child's lack of interest? In most of the world, that notion would simply be absurd.
But back in Britain, we lay the blame at the teacher's door. We spend our time wishing we could have better teachers. We spend all our cash and our energies training better teachers. And we miss the obvious fact which has been sitting in front of us all along. If we want to be successful, all we need to do is to make our kids into better kids.

32 comments:
How about better parents?
How about Nuns?
You know, the black veiled, white wimpled, rap kids over the knuckles with a ruler and threaten them with Damnation brand?
So, Sister Snuffy? What do you think? ;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2s7YP3tWU_Y&feature=related
Keep the Faith!
OMG! A lightbulb has just pinged on above my head. You are absolutely right. Scarily so. All of those little embryonic consumers, waiting to see if they will get their 'money's worth' from their teachers. If it's boring and they fail, then it's not their fault! I'm not sure if I feel glad or sad now I have finished my lesson plans for tomorrow....
I love all this "better teachers" stuff. Classic nonsense
Here in banking we're told we need better management. Err ... banking was the career of choice for the top graduates of the elite universities of the world. Then there was fierce competition internally for the top jobs.
So where are these better managers going to come from? are banks going to start rejecting applicants who did too well in their exams? Who are too articulate and ambitious?
Presumably the better teachers will come from the same place as the better bank managers.
Wow Snuffy you really are prolific with your blog!
To the point however I agree with you.
I'm not involved in teaching but I want to vomit when I pick up the paper, turn on the news or listen to some arse of an educationalist drone on and on on Radio 5 Live.
Blah blah blah World class teachers, blah blah blah X millions poured into education blah blah blah investing in new schools etc.
Guess what all of this is pointless if;
A) Teachers can't won't or arn't allowed to exercise discipline in the classroom.
B) The curriclum concentrates on total pap like PSHE and citizenship; schools should be teaching children the 3 'R's History, Science, Sports/PE.
C) Children are rewarded and graded not according to ability or success in their efforts, but just so the poor little darlings won't feel hurt or upset (that big old world's waiting out there son, and it won't be so generous).
D) Subjects and exams have been so watered down as to be almost meaningless.
Yes we need good teachers not exceptional teachers, as you so quite rightly identified Snuffy exceptional by definition means extraordindary.
First lets get the system right then turn our attention to the parents!!!
Stop giving underage teenage girls the pill or any other form of contraception, stop giving them access to school counsellors/nurses who will arrange quickie abortions behind their parents backs.
Stop providing creches and school uniform maternity smocks to school girls and, bring some stigma back to being a single teenage mother!
And yes stop showering them with council accommodation and state benefits.
We have children, who have already proven themselves to be undisciplined and irresponsible, bringing up children. Their offspring never know any real father figure just a series of feckless waster boyfriends of their mothers.
By all of the above we encourage and condone this behaviour; the results are plain for all to see (unless you read the Guardian).
Having a child should be a serious commitment not a career choice i.e. state benefits over a job, or the result of a quick fumble behind the bus shelter after a spliff and a couple of bottles of white lightening.
Pity the poor bloody teacher who has to teach these wretched children never mind deal with the foul mouth gobby harridan of so-called mother.
Snuffy you have my complete sympathy the only mystery to me is who the hell you can manage to keep doing it!
Snuffy, I hate to criticise, your blog really is generally wonderfully thought provoking, but where are you getting information about China?
I've "taught" (coached oral English really) in the countryside and the cities and have never seen such a demoralised, unhappy, abused group of people as teachers there.
China makes insane demands on its teachers, work weeks of 70 or 80 hours are common, for peanuts pay.
Bonuses are linked to students performance on exams, which is a bit of a shame if you get stuck teaching the remedial class. Too bad, no bonus for you!
"Interest" in a subject is totally irrelevant, it doesn't matter a whit if the student loves the topic or hates it, so long as they score well on the exam. The teacher might be blamed if the student fails, but only if the child's parent is important.
Teachers are treated like a disposable commodity by schools, subject to routine brutal dressings down and humiliating abuse by school leaders.
They do actually try to make some subjects fun, that's why they hire goofballs like me for oral English classes and pay us a (relatively) terrific wage: we're the only motivated, happy teachers in the school.
It's an otherwise good post, but the stuff about China was such a clanger it really drew me up short.
Could you please expand on your idea to make better kids? That's a topic that sounds really interesting...
You're right of course. I always hated it when people blamed their failure on their teachers.
We need better, more motivated kids. Kids who are willing to take responsibility on themselves. Question is how?
On the basis that I know nothing about teaching in a secondary school, may I ask you, Miss, and the teachers who post here a couple of questions which have bothered me for some years.
1. Why is good teaching, fun teaching? A lot learning is not fun, but dull. There is, to mind, nothing entertaining about glaciers, for example. Why is a teacher who can entertain a whole class for 40 minutes considered a better teacher than one who knows his or her subject very well?
2. So much criticism is levelled against the British education system that it is often overlooked how how the standards it sets itself are. When I took A Levels, A level education was at the level of an average college education in the United States. It seems to me (I stress again, an ignorant outsider) that even GCSEs are ambitious in asking children to address questions that might be better left until university. Nobody really knows why WW1 started for example. Wouldn't giving children some information about the shape of pre-war WW1 Europe and its contrast with post Versailles Europe be better than attempting to get them to evaluate sources? In short is British education too ambitious?
@ anonymous - Withdraw contraception advice and you get MORE single mums, not less, besides they aren't the root of ALL evil - walk the walk before talking the talk. But hey, everyone has bees in bonnets.
@ jolly bonnets - you sound about my age, but levels for somethings have fallen, whereas others have improved. To-day's A-level student works as hard as we did, though the French one is about the same as my O-level, BUT I would never have coped with the oral at that age.
However having no manufacturing base left, not that it would be competitive if we had, and skimming percentages from the Shitty having put us up a creek, we are a 'value added' economy, therefore needing the educational bar set higher, rather than lower.
Living in France and starting to think about where to send kids to Uni - States too expensive, almost ditto UK, whereas even 20 years ago Indian graduated were higher calibre than our own.
@ Snuffy - apologies, I appear to be off on one to-day!
In complete agreement with you, BUT as we know there are teachers who can kill a subject dead, and you haven't alluded to the even higher burn-out rate suffered by the extraordinary teachers.
j
Weary has called it right.
It is only for a relatively small amount of time that children are in school. The evidence mounts up that home life is essential. This probably accounts for a lot of why schools in deprived areas tend to be worse, as pupils are (statistically) less likely to have a decent environment to grow up in.
Those whose parents read to them & restrict their TV & computer game access are far more likely to thrive. Isn't that obvious? It is a mixture of genetic & environmental factors. Something can be done about the latter & it is to a large a parent's role to do it.
A lot of people assume education should be wholly left to teachers, but I see no reason why parents should be exempt from pulling their weight. They were the ones who decided to have offspring & bear that grave responsibility in life. (something I haven't done & probably never will, because I don't think I'd be a good parent... if only certain individuals would follow the same thinking as me, eh?)
I'm just chipping in to agree with Robaroo. Teaching in China is great if you're a laowai, not so hot for the average teacher.
A couple of well known sayings:
1/You can lead a horse to water but you cant make him drink- It is pointless having kids in school that don't want to be there, not only do they achieve nothing but they put others off and I can't imagine they're a joy to teach.
2/ The best drives out the good:- the more you try and get perfect teachers, the fewer ordinary good ones you get (in practice the numbers are made up by cheating- so no-one really knows what the standard is. Trying to teach people more than they can absorb or understand results in a lower standard of attainment, not a higher one.
Allowing the rebellious and disinterested to drop out would help them understand what education is for- and there is always the option of nightschool.
J
Actually no you don't get more single mums.
We've more single teenage parents now then ever and all since we've started to encourage this behaviour by condoning it through the back door.
I'm afraid they are the 'root of all evil' as you put it. Because it's from them that many of our current problems stem.
Re-read my post. Irresponsible children rearing children; what do you think is going to happen.
I'm not suggesting we don't have sex education, but behaviour often stems from attitudes, and attitudes can be shaped.
encourage and promote self-respect and abstinence untill an appropraite age (that would be sixteen or over)or do you think it's fine for a couple of fourteen year olds to have sex!
Children deserve their childhood, and should not have to make adult choices about abortion at fourteen or fifteen.
Most of the children from these backgrounds end up taking drugs, and getting in to trouble with the police, or do you think it's the children who have been well brought up by two loving adult parents are the ones on our streets robbing, knifing and dealing in drugs.
Open your eyes the evidence is all around you.
In the short run you're going to have more single mums, but with no 'safety net' of emergency contraception the next generation are more likely to think twice before having unprotected sex.
Well said.
"We've more single teenage parents now then ever"
No, we don't. The teenage birthrate has been steadily declining since the 1960s; teenage unmarried births peaked in 1991 in absolute terms and in 1999 as a proportion of total births. Even the youngest mums from the 1991 peak will now be 30; even the youngest mums from the 1999 peak will now be 22.
...and there's an enormous positive correlation internationally between countries that provide good sex education and widespread contraception to teens, and countries with low teen birth rates.
But everyone non-mad knew this already, I assume.
Points about Chinese education seconded - added to the points above are the complete lack of any kind of 'independent thinking' focus, which makes China completely crap at things involving creativity and innovation (y'know, the things we do really well, that are highly prized and that can't just be done by machines...)
Yeah, this whole issue boils down to a question of, in the very end, who needs to be responsible?
To say that the responsibility should be the teachers' is silly and unrealistic. Here in the States, NCLB has become the single biggest problem of the education system precisely because it puts all responsibility (i.e.) blame on the teachers' shoulders, so it's hard for teachers to do their jobs and hold their students up to any reasonable expectations.
Then, they land in my Comp. class in college and look at me bug eyed when I tell them that they are, in fact failing because they haven't done the work/come to class/whatever.
The current public school system is instilling in some students that little/no effort is actually required and many of them get rude awakenings when they hit college where NCLB does not rule. When, suddenly, THEY are the ones responsible for their performance.
Better children required, definitely.
As a friend & I were saying yesterday, any female can become a mother, & without training, yet it's one of the most responsible careers in the world, along with being a father.
Pity some children never really get to experience having either.
"banking was the career of choice for the top graduates of the elite universities of the world. Then there was fierce competition internally for the top jobs."
I think the essential fact that was missed when banking became the career of choice for the people you mention, and that the banks cheerfully hired, was that they largely consisted of greedy, compassionless, self-obsessed and over-privileged wankers.
It's not amazing that they've (you've) created such a mess. It's amazing that it took so long. Any chance on seeing the memo informing me of when you'll all be burned atop some sort of commemorative pyre?
"But back in Britain, we lay the blame at the teacher's door. We spend our time wishing we could have better teachers"
To be fair lots of teachers support the system of benefits etc which causes the problem children - despite the fact that they should know that this a bad system
"Stop providing creches and school uniform maternity smocks to school girls and, bring some stigma back to being a single teenage mother!
And yes stop showering them with council accommodation and state benefits. "
Good idea
Snuffy,
You remind me of Brecht's poem on the East German uprising of 1953 (I'm sure you were only joking):
After the uprising of the 17th of June
The Secretary of the Writers Union
Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee
Stating that the people
Had thrown away the confidence of the government
And could win it back only
By redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?
The Girl,
The dirty little secret of American K12 education is that public school pupils have nearly 70% more spent on them than private school pupils.
"when banking became the career of choice for the people you mention, and that the banks cheerfully hired, was that they largely consisted of greedy, compassionless, self-obsessed and over-privileged wankers"
Well Guernican, its hard to argue with that. A lot were more self-aware than is generally recognised, but then again a lot weren't.
"Any chance on seeing the memo informing me of when you'll all be burned atop some sort of commemorative pyre?"
If you're looking to finance the purchase of a large pile of combustible material then for a small arrangement fee I can put you in touch with the right people.
The Girl
Hello. Nice flower.
John B
I never said China was good at developing independent thinking in their children.
Robaroo
Hello. The teachers I met in China seemed happy. But I wasn't saying that teacher in China are happy and those in Britain are not. Neither was I saying Chinese teachers do not work hard. They do. I was saying that there is a respect given to teachers in China which we do not give here, as a nation. And that is destructive. You have misunderstood my meaning.
Hi Snuffy
Take a look at this
Enjoy!
You don't fatten a pig by weighing it.
"Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?"
Already being dealt with. About halfway done.
Ah yes, but people aren't allowed to fail in our society - whatever they've done, it has to be the fault of someone else, preferably the local authority or government agency.
You're absolutely right, though, I've taught in public and private schools in the UK and North America, and the best teachers I've worked with were at a 'challenging' school in West London. Hard working, caring, tough, dedicated - there were a couple of lazy arses, but they were rightly held in contempt by the kids and staff alike.
It's simple Darwinian logic, I suppose, in a very hostile environment, only the very best will adapt and survive. I can't tell you how much I miss my old school - I don't mind managing lazy kids, it is incredibly frustrating managing lazy staff and watching the kids deteriorate as a result.
Speaking of which, I can see a kid out of class without a hall pass. Time to go and do someone else's job for them again.
Hi Miss Snuffleupagus,
I hope you are well. I have really enjoyed looking through your blog, and I completely agree with the post ‘Better Teachers’ Mon 24th Nov ’08, we need kinds that are more willing to learn and take an interest in subjects. I hope that it is ok for me to quickly introduce myself and tell you a bit about an upcoming event.
I work for a PR company called Fleishman-Hillard and we are currently working with The Big Bang, which is the UK’s first national fair celebrating young people’s achievements in science and engineering. The Big Bang is celebrating both science and engineering talent in the UK to ensure this talent is nurtured for the future.
The event is being held at the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, Westminster, London from the 4th-6th of March 2009, just prior to National Science and Engineering Week. The Big Bang’s aim is to motivate schools and young people from diverse backgrounds to embrace science, technology, engineering and maths, especially those that do not have achievements in these subjects.
Over the three days, nearly nine thousand young people; teachers; representatives from science and engineering organisations and employers; government ministers; members of parliament; and peers are expected to attend this event. It will span seven floors of the QE2 Centre, featuring compelling theatre shows, activities and hands on investigations, and opportunities to see the many real world applications of science and technology. School groups arrive for half-day sessions, where they will see one theatre show, and take part in one activity and one workshop from a huge choice.
The Big Bang is free to all who attend but spaces are limited, maintained schools have been especially encouraged. Only visiting school groups are able to register and those interested can do so at www.thebigbangfair.co.uk, Already 20 London schools and approximately 500 students have confirmed their attendance.
The Big Bang also features the newly established National Science Competition. Featuring 200 project stands showcasing highly innovative science and engineering projects. A number of prizes will be awarded on March 5th, including UK Young Scientist of the Year and UK Young Technologist of the Year.
I hope that this is of interest to you, your readers, your school or even your class.
Thanks,
Chloe.
p.s. I will only be in the office until the 13th Feb (I’m leaving for Australia! Bring on the hot weather!!), so please contact Joshua.davidson@fleishmaneurope.com if you have any more questions. (My e-mail is Chloe.Vallun-Kruger@fleishmaneurope.com)
Also I couldn’t find an e-mail address for you, so this is was the only way I could get in contact with you =)
Post a Comment